A Review of Presidential Energy Policy

A new presidential speech on energy policy means it’s time again to trot out this historic overview of the subject:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
An Energy-Independent Future
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party


Did you notice that there was a particular energy source that they consistently failed to mention?

Comments

comments


14 Replies to "A Review of Presidential Energy Policy"

  • Robert Hargraves
    March 30, 2011 (9:25 pm)
    Reply

    The President did say we can't take nuclear energy off the table.

  • Jonathan Goff
    March 30, 2011 (10:22 pm)
    Reply

    Kirk,
    Thanks! That was hilarious. 🙂

    ~Jon

  • Raul Parolari
    March 31, 2011 (2:31 am)
    Reply

    Hi, Kirk

    I would like to translate your googletechtalks videos in Italian (in spite of Carlo Rubbia, nobody knows about Thorium there, including me until recently), Spanish (and perhaps French), and publish them in youtube (if ok with you, by the way; of course, all attributions, etc).

    The reason is that it is impossible for foreigners (even with a decent knowledge of English) to follow your speeches (too fast, too "explosive" and funny, which is of course a delight for an anglo-saxon audience).

    Now, only one of the videos ("Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?") has the interactive transcript showing the text, so that helps. Before trying speech recognition tools (or, God forbid, transcribing from audio), I wanted to know if the text of some of those speeches by chance exists already. Probably not, but just to make sure.

    Thank you

    Raul

  • Tas
    March 31, 2011 (8:11 am)
    Reply

    Crying shame nothing from the Daily Show site seems to be accessible outside the US.

  • Ben
    March 31, 2011 (10:15 am)
    Reply

    Kirk:
    We've got to get you on TV and get your message out there. Have you tried contacting any well known programs?

  • Marcus
    March 31, 2011 (1:22 pm)
    Reply

    I can watch without problems from Germany.

  • Iain McClatchie
    March 31, 2011 (7:10 pm)
    Reply

    Nixon and Ford both mention nuclear.

    I guess the French were listening.

    -Iain

  • Paul C from Austin
    April 1, 2011 (12:28 am)
    Reply

    Almost a year old, but still funny (and sad) as heck!

  • John Chatelle
    April 2, 2011 (10:48 am)
    Reply

    It seems more of the same. Obama is apparently going to recast the status quo rather than break it, just as the last 8 President's have. Energy forms that would challenge existing energy industries have no political money or influence, but can threaten those that do. Energy markets are very price elastic with respect to supply/demand, and even market perceptions, so, any new forms of energy are a threat to existing energy industries.

    The IFR block of 1994 is great evidence.

    I'm convinced that the world needs to wait for the Chinese, South Koreans, Indians and Japanese for the new forms of energy that humanity so vitally needs.

  • Tas
    April 2, 2011 (3:04 pm)
    Reply

    Thankfully I found the US energy independence clip uploaded online: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xhxt4f_us-energy

    You're right guys, its epic! 🙂

  • Tas
    April 2, 2011 (3:10 pm)
    Reply

    Nevermind the previous link. It seems broken already. My apologies.

  • Tas
    April 2, 2011 (3:31 pm)
    Reply

    The clip is available here instead:

    Hopefully it stays up.

  • Michael Stone-Richar
    April 4, 2011 (6:24 am)
    Reply

    How unfortunate that Richard Nixon, who set the benchmark for what a president ought not to be, looks so good in comparison to those who came after. I used to loathe Nixon and speak out against nuclear energy. I sure have changed.

  • Rodrigo
    April 5, 2011 (5:41 am)
    Reply

    This guy is awesome!!


Leave a Reply