Energy From Thorium Discussion Forum

It is currently Jan 23, 2018 12:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Feb 12, 2016 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sep 02, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 507
Thanks indeed,

No ThorCon or Moltex?

And Transatomic called away at last minute.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 12, 2016 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3387
Location: Alabama
alexterrell wrote:
No ThorCon or Moltex?


ThorCon didn't present. Moltex and U-battery did present but we didn't take any notes since we were in and out of the room.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 14, 2016 12:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2230
Terrestrial energy seem to be half a step ahead of others in making a build-able deign. Wish them godspeed along with the good sense to replace graphite with a low vapor pressure moderator-coolant. Something like an engine oil may do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 14, 2016 2:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Nov 14, 2013 7:47 pm
Posts: 569
Location: Iowa, USA
Having just read the thread on our plutonium disposal problem I am compelled to ask if using plutonium as fuel came up.

Also, how much discussion of using nuclear power plants as a source of medical and industrial isotopes was there? There is much demand for RTG material and isotopes for medical uses like bone scans and cancer treatment.

_________________
Disclaimer: I am an engineer but not a nuclear engineer, mechanical engineer, chemical engineer, or industrial engineer. My education included electrical, computer, and software engineering.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2016 8:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2230
If they use 20%LEU in the liquid fuel, they could use some thorium profitably. They could use it to double up as metallic cladding for whatever moderator they use.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: May 17, 2016 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Dec 22, 2015 8:40 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Florida
Yes, I add my thanks for these minutes, Quincy (little late for me; better than never?).

Jeff Merrifield has been mentioned very few times on this forum: once here and in the following post by "jaro" (why are members here so shy in the ID department?). Merrifield was on BOTH panels for the s.2795 and H.R.4979 hearings last April. At the very end of the Senate hearing, he managed to squeeze in a mentioned of "molten salts." I held my breath they'd avoid mention of specific fuel cycle and they did.

Re: Terrestrial Energy engages with CNSC
jaro, Feb 25, 2016 10:23 am wrote:
Terrestrial Energy Announces its Engagement with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Quote:
The Honorable Jeffrey Merrifield, former Commissioner at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said:

"Attentive industry observers will appreciate the significance of Terrestrial Energy's announcement - this is the first Molten Salt Reactor system to begin regulatory engagement with a western nuclear regulatory authority."

Former NRC Commissioner (1998-2007), Jeff Merrifield, Chairman, Nuclear Infrastructure Council—Advanced Reactor Task Force, in this letter:
April 29, 2016 wrote:
Dear Chairman Upton, Ranking Member Pallone, Chairman Whitfield and Ranking Member Rush:

The U.S. Nuclear Infrastructure Council is writing to commend the Committee’s bipartisan support for advanced nuclear energy reactor innovation and development as manifested by H.R. 4979, the Advanced Nuclear Technology Development Act of 2016.

As the leading American business consortium advocate for new nuclear energy and the promotion of the U.S. supply chain globally, we believe that trailblazing the advance of nuclear energy technology including Gen 3+, Small Modular Reactors, Non-Light Water Reactors, Advanced Reactors and Fusion Reactors is one of the key imperatives for U.S. market competitiveness and is vital to maintaining the U.S. lead in technology innovation, safety enhancements, energy security and carbon reduction.

To this end, we welcome the focus of H.R. 4979 on supporting the continued use of the current fleet of nuclear reactors and enabling the development of advanced nuclear reactor technologies by enhancing accountability in the NRC’s budget and fee programs as well as ensuring that the Commission develops a modern, technology neutral framework that allows for the phased and expedited licensing of advanced reactor technologies. This legislation follows a number of the key recommendations that were included in the Advanced Reactor White Paper that NIC issued on February 22, 2016.

We applaud the Committee for quickly moving forward on this legislation and we stand ready to provide our assistance in support of its timely passage.

Please note that while these views represent the consensus of the U.S. Nuclear Infrastructure Council, they do not necessarily represent the views of individual member companies.

Flibe Energy is a member of NIC. Signing The Advanced Nuclear Technology Development Act of 2016 into law would help Flibe Energy develop and commercially deploy its design specifically aimed at the pure thorium fuel cycle.

_________________
"Those who say it can’t be done are usually interrupted by others doing it."

—James Arthur Baldwin, American novelist, essayist, playwright, poet, and social critic


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group