Energy From Thorium Discussion Forum

It is currently Jun 23, 2018 10:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2016 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3631
Location: Alabama
Paducah Laser Nuclear Enrichment Facility Gets Fuel but Not Formal Construction Decision

Quote:
While GE-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment (GLE) confirmed it hasn’t made a formal decision to proceed with licensing or construction of a laser enrichment facility at Paducah, Ky., the Department of Energy (DOE) announced it has agreed to sell depleted uranium to the company over a 40-year period to help produce nuclear power plant fuel.

The DOE said that GLE would finance, construct, own, and operate the Paducah Laser Enrichment Facility proposed for a site near the DOE’s Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in western Kentucky. The commercial facility is expected to use, under a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) license, depleted uranium to produce natural uranium, which will then be used for production of fuel for U.S. civil nuclear reactors. The agreement provides for the sale of about 300,000 metric tons of DOE-owned high-assay uranium hexafluoride (DUF6) inventories for re-enrichment using proprietary SILEX technology to produce natural-grade uranium.

Yet, as a GE Power spokesperson told POWER on November 11, GLE “has made no formal decision to proceed with licensing or construction of the facility.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2016 6:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Nov 14, 2013 7:47 pm
Posts: 568
Location: Iowa, USA
Did I read that correctly? It sounds like they are taking the tailings from a previous enrichment, the depleted uranium, and running through this new enrichment process to squeeze out whatever U-235 the previous enrichment missed. Do I have that right?

If I undertand this correctly then I'm left wondering if uranium prices have become so expensive that we are seeing people going back to a well that was previously considered dry. Is there a shortage of natural uranium or something?

I'd appreciate a correction/clarification on what they are trying to do here.

_________________
Disclaimer: I am an engineer but not a nuclear engineer, mechanical engineer, chemical engineer, or industrial engineer. My education included electrical, computer, and software engineering.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2016 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3631
Location: Alabama
Kurt Sellner wrote:
Did I read that correctly? It sounds like they are taking the tailings from a previous enrichment, the depleted uranium, and running through this new enrichment process to squeeze out whatever U-235 the previous enrichment missed. Do I have that right?


Pretty much. The old gaseous diffusion process used at Paducah was so expensive and wasteful of energy that they ran some pretty "high-tails" runs there for many years. GE-H probably realizes that with their technology, which I have heard from some people that I believe is incredibly energy efficient, they can run all those tails through the laser process and "mine" a bunch more U-235.

I had to snicker when I saw that they "bought" all that depleted uranium from the DOE. I'll bet they paid a dollar for the whole lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Nov 13, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Jun 19, 2013 11:49 am
Posts: 1521
Gas Diffusion's only real advantage was that it was the best of the three WW2 era enrichment processes.
Once Gas Centrifuges came along it was doomed.
Lasers are more energy efficient, if they can get them to work properly, but the gas centrifuge does have the advantage of flexibility.
For example Urenco use their spare centrifuge capacity to enrich a variety of other isotopes for other purposes - lasers require fundamentally different equipment for each isotope to be seperated, and many cannot be so seperated.

The only more flexible technology is the mooted plasma centrifuge that would be able to enrich literally anything you can make a solid electrode out of.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 02, 2017 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3631
Location: Alabama
Hitachi to take a 70 billion yen hit after U.S nuclear project fails

Quote:
Hitachi is expected to report a 70 billion yen ($620 million) non-operating loss by the time books are closed for fiscal 2016 at the end of March, said Mitsuaki Nishiyama, a senior vice president of the Tokyo-based conglomerate, in a news conference on the company’s performance through the third quarter. The deficit is largely attributed to the joint venture GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Inc. withdrawing from the uranium enrichment project. Due to this decision, Hitachi no longer expects any profits from the North Carolina-based company, of which it owns 40 percent and the rest by General Electric. After allocating the losses, the value of Hitachi’s share of the joint venture comes to only about 11 billion yen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 05, 2017 4:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2230
Now the world has substantial amount of enriched uranium, reactor grade plutonium and additional plutonium locked in used LWR fuel. We should take a fresh look at nuclear power and find the most efficient ways of producing it. Thing which, by my laymans thinking are,
1. Changing the fuel cycles to incorporate use of a thorium blanket in all types of reactors. It will result in production of larger quantity of U-233, a superior fissile for reactors.
2. Use of fast cycle in all new designs. It will result in higher fissile production.
Let us replace enrichment with more efficient chemical processes now that it is possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Jun 13, 2018 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3631
Location: Alabama
WNN: Silex Systems out of GLE restructure

Quote:
GE-Hitachi (GEH) announced in 2016 its intention to exit the GLE joint business venture, which was set up by GE (51%), Hitachi (25%) and Cameco (24%) to develop uranium enrichment services capability and is the exclusive licensee for the SILEX laser isotope separation process technology developed by Sydney, Australia-based Silex in the 1990s. In May 2016, Silex and GEH agreed to negotiate a mutually acceptable restructure of GLE, with Silex potentially taking an equity position in the company by acquiring GEH's 76% interest. Silex yesterday said that despite being at an advanced stage in negotiations with GEH there remained too many risks associated with GLE's business case. Investment in GLE, with the entailed ongoing expenditure, would not be in its shareholders' interests, it said.

"This is a very disappointing outcome for the company," Silex CEO Michael Goldsworthy said yesterday. "The SILEX technology remains one of the most exciting developments in the nuclear industry for several decades, and after 20 years of cooperative development with the US, was just three years from reaching a key demonstration of full-scale 24/7 operation. Unfortunately, the continuing decline in the nuclear fuel markets precipitated by the tragic events of Fukushima in 2011, in combination with unresolved issues relating to the GLE restructure and the associated cash burn, has forced the Board to draw a line and make this decision," he added. Silex has now given notice for the termination of a term sheet on the proposed acquisition and by doing so, its monthly funding obligations of about AUD600,000 (USD455,000) per month for GEH's operations have ceased. Silex also said it intends to give notice to GLE of the termination of the SILEX technology licence "unless circumstances change dramatically in the short term". GEH yesterday told World Nuclear News that it is evaluating the impact of this development, and will continue to work with the US government and other key stakeholders to determine next steps.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group