Energy From Thorium Discussion Forum

It is currently Apr 27, 2017 7:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Jan 18, 2015 6:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5006
Just checking the math here.

Assume 3400 MWt PWR, core flow 67 million kg/h primary flow rate. Assuming 4% of the thermal load generated by absorption of neutrons and gammas in the water. This makes an ionizing radiation heating of 136 MWt, 489600 MJ/h. 7300 Gray/h.

That's a yearly dose of some 64,000,000 Gray/year. Yes, MILLION grays per year.

Is this roughly correct?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Jan 18, 2015 6:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5006
I guess my question is, OR do you use the total core coolant inventory only (not the flow rate) since this is the same water that gets circulated many times over?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Jan 18, 2015 12:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Oct 28, 2013 12:24 am
Posts: 251
I guess that 7300 Grays is the dose received by the water which passes only one time in the core. Since the water passes many times in the core we must divided the energy received by the water in one hour by the total inventory of water of the primary circuit ( some water remains in the pressurizer but we can neglect this effect if we want an order of magnitude).

The datas I have is that the volume of primary water for a 3817 MWth 4 loops PWR at full power in steady state is 399 m^3 of liquid water and 25 m^3 of steam (I guess that it is saturated steam in the pressurizer, I don't take it into consideration).

With an approximation of liquid water at 700 kg/m^3 , we have an estimation of roughly 250 tons of water in the primary circuit of your 3400 MWth PWR.

If we assume 4 % of the thermal load generated in the water, that gives us a dose of roughly 2 000 000 Gray/h or 17.5 billions grays per year.

Sorry for the eventual mistakes.


PS : the fraction of power generated in the coolant seems to be 2.6 % in this document ( see page 22 of the PDF ) :
http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2Fcourses%2Fnuclear-engineering%2F22-06-engineering-of-nuclear-systems-fall-2010%2Flectures-and-readings%2FMIT22_06F10_lec06a.pdf&ei=X-y7VIqqHo3saMS-gPgP&usg=AFQjCNFP2AS_9WpFDdytX3APuw1XHBc7fQ&sig2=f5gf7zduRFfoIPa0FTO8VA


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Jan 18, 2015 1:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5006
Thanks a lot fab. So we are looking at ballpark figures of 11 billion gray per year.

This simple exercise really makes me appreciate a nuclear coolant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Jan 18, 2015 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3158
Location: Alabama
So how many neutrons does a PWR spend turning protium into deuterium?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Jan 19, 2015 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5006
Kirk Sorensen wrote:
So how many neutrons does a PWR spend turning protium into deuterium?


Good question! I don't know really. Most of the literature just talks about non-fuel captures, which includes boron in the coolant and zircalloy clad. Its got to be over 5% though.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group