# Energy From Thorium Discussion Forum

 It is currently Dec 09, 2018 7:23 pm

 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

 Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Decay heat power for U233 fission productsPosted: Nov 23, 2012 6:09 am

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5039
ORNL 4541 has a graph with U233 fission product decay heat by time.

http://www.energyfromthorium.com/pdf/ORNL-4541.pdf

Fig. 6.4. Total afterheat production, p. 91 in document, p. 109 in Acrobat. Also compare table 3.11 on p. 57 in Acrobat.

Now this is something very different from the usual decay heat curves we're used to.

Code:
T (seconds) PMWt P%
1           86   3.8%
10          75   3.3%
100         55   2.4%
1000        33   1.5%
10000       17   0.8%
100000      10   0.4%
1000000      5   0.2%

There could be an error here. Perhaps the t=1 second is actually the t=100 seconds data point? This is what table 3.11 suggests, but figure 6.4 clearly states 10e0 seconds.

Last edited by Cyril R on Nov 23, 2012 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decay heat power for U233 fission productsPosted: Nov 23, 2012 8:19 am

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5039
Ok, so the figure 6.4 apparently excludes the processing system, except at shutdown. Similar to table 3.11. That's 1.5 MW of FPs and 5 MW of Pa at shutdown.

So to get the figure for say a DMSR, with some FPs and Pa in the salt, add 6 MW medium term, later 5.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decay heat power for U233 fission productsPosted: Nov 23, 2012 12:28 pm

Joined: Jul 28, 2008 10:44 pm
Posts: 3060
Figure 6.4 is for the decay heat in the drain tank. The paragraph that refers to it (pg 90) talks about the time (7 minutes) it takes to drain from the core to the drain tank and the maximum power being 50MWatts. From the common formula the expected total power would be 58MW at 100seconds and 37mW at 1000 seconds. A peaks of 50MW seems reasonable - if I use the common formula and assume a linear transfer rate from t=0 to t=420 seconds the peak in the drain tank is 43.8MW.

I don't understand why the figure shows a significantly lower initial heat load than LWRs. The major difference I think would be that we have 233Pa decay and they have 239U decay.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decay heat power for U233 fission productsPosted: Nov 23, 2012 1:56 pm

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5039
The drain tank, of course that makes sense, ORNL planned on having the brunt of offgas decay in the drain tank.

The lower initial heat load is indeed a mystery. Pa decay is only 5 MWt. U239 decay has to be lower than that. It doesn't explain the difference. I included Pa and the reprocessing system heat load (about 6.5 MW total) in the 86 MWt figure. So that's all we have, 3.8% of fullpower at 1 second after shutdown. In LWRs we expect around 6.5% at 1 second after shutdown.

Not that this matters much, everything below 10 seconds can just be ignored as the temp rise from that period is so small.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decay heat power for U233 fission productsPosted: Nov 23, 2012 3:17 pm

Joined: Jul 28, 2008 10:44 pm
Posts: 3060
I'm thinking that they used 10 seconds after shutdown as "at shutdown". It takes a few seconds to shutdown the fission power so a 1 second after shutdown is not so meaningful either. But like you said, in the end it doesn't matter since the time is so short that only a modest amount of thermal energy gets deposited during this time.

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ General Nuclear Discussion    Forum Policies and Posting Help    General Discussion    Political, Industrial, Organizational Developments    Safety, Security, Proliferation    Reprocessing, Transmutation, Waste Storage    Thorium in the News National Nuclear Programs    United States    Canada    United Kingdom    France    Netherlands, Belgium    Germany    Czech Republic and Poland    Europe    Russia    MENA (Middle East / North Africa)    China    Japan    Korea    ASEAN (Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, etc.)    India General Energy Discussion    Energy Issues and Technologies Registered Discussion    Registered Discussion    Conferences and Public Education Liquid-Halide Reactors    Fluoride Reactor Design    Fluoride Reactor Processing    Chloride Reactor Design    Reactor Materials and Fluids    Power Conversion Systems    Reactor Dynamics and Control Solid-Fueled Reactors    Water-Cooled Reactors    Gas-Cooled Reactors    Liquid-Metal-Cooled Reactors    Salt-Cooled Reactors Thorium and Uranium Fuel Cycles    Uranium and Thorium Supply    Uranium Enrichment