Energy From Thorium Discussion Forum

It is currently Feb 23, 2018 7:25 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Jul 09, 2017 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2239
The current boss in the US is quite unpredictable. He may decide to proceed with Yucca.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Jul 31, 2017 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
The Battle of Yucca Mountain


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Aug 09, 2017 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
Nuclear Regulatory Commission restarts Yucca Mountain licensing process

Quote:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted 2-1 to begin actions related to the review of the Department of Energy's license to build the radioactive waste facility after the Obama administration attempted to scuttle the program entirely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Sep 28, 2017 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
Officials frustrated over lack of progress on Yucca Mountain

Quote:
Meanwhile, nuclear power reactors produce 2,000 tons of nuclear waste every year to produce 20 percent of the electricity used in the United States, said Katie Tubb with the Heritage Foundation. Tubb said “politics” has been the biggest stumbling block to licensing Yucca Mountain, noting that the licensing process was stopped under President Barrack Obama because of opposition by then-Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev. But she also noted that the state of Nevada has significant challenges to the license that must be addressed if the process is continued.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Sep 29, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2239
The solution could be outsourcing the job of reprocessing. The partitioning of used fuel could split the job of disposal. Fissile could be sold as fuel for fast reactors or thorium fuel. Fission products could be buried in boreholes along with most of radioactivity. Recovered could be used as fuel in fast reactors.
To get over the NIMBY problem, floating platforms could be created for fast reactors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Sep 30, 2017 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Jun 05, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 1330
Location: NoOPWA
jagdish wrote:
... Fission products could be buried in boreholes along with most of radioactivity. ...
Why bother with bore holes? Cement it into the bottom of the mine it came from and let it decay naturally.

_________________
DRJ : Engineer - NAVSEA : (Retired)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Oct 01, 2017 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Jul 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Posts: 5060
KitemanSA wrote:
jagdish wrote:
... Fission products could be buried in boreholes along with most of radioactivity. ...
Why bother with bore holes? Cement it into the bottom of the mine it came from and let it decay naturally.


The experience from the Oklo nuclear reactors proves that you can store this stuff just about anywhere you want, as long as it's several hundred meters deep.

Boreholes are interesting as they eliminate expensive underground engineering works. Plus they make heat management rather easy. Drilling holes at least is something we've become rather good at.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Oct 03, 2017 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Dec 14, 2006 1:01 pm
Posts: 380
Boreholes are the standard system for Finland, which has an authorized disposal process. (AFAIK, the only one!) I agree that they're wasteful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Oct 06, 2017 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2239
Mined holes are best left to rejects of uranium milling.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Oct 17, 2017 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
Longtime Yucca Mountain booster in Congress makes his pitch in Nevada


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Oct 18, 2017 12:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2239
Home States get a veto on federal projects in progress.
No say for Home Counties most effected?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Jan 19, 2018 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
The Indy Asks: Can Heller, as Reid did, stop Yucca?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Jan 23, 2018 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 2239
The point is can anyone revive a good idea?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Jan 31, 2018 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
Lake Barrett: 20 Years Late but DOE Needs to Jumpstart Yucca Mountain and Consolidated Storage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yucca Mountain
PostPosted: Jan 31, 2018 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Jun 19, 2013 11:49 am
Posts: 1502
As these repositories tend to be heat limited, doesn't the amount of waste that would fit into Yucca Mountain increase year-by-year as the average age of the waste to be deposited increases?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group