Energy From Thorium Discussion Forum

It is currently Feb 23, 2018 7:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Author Message
PostPosted: Dec 10, 2017 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Nov 30, 2006 3:30 pm
Posts: 3428
Location: Alabama
Atomic Insights: Challenging established paradigms in one of the world’s largest industries

Read the comments. Rod Adams is positively apologetic for Leslie's gross technical errors. Would that he showed such latitude to other designs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Feb 06, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Oct 06, 2010 9:12 pm
Posts: 139
Location: Cleveland, OH
I see there is some more papers posted at the bottom of their main page, Neutronics White Paper v1.1 and ORNL-TM-2017-475, that shed more light on their moderator rod design. Appendix A in Neutronics White Paper v1.1 shows a rod radius of 1.25 cm, and silicon carbide in Table A.1 as part of the material composition. In ORNL-TM-2017-475 shows the cladding thickness at 0.1 cm in Table 1.

Seems to me that these folks are betting the farm on the ability of this cladding to survive the harsh environment of the reactor core. And I'm not sure what is driving such faith, other than "it would be really great if..."

Oh well.

Jim L.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group