"If CAGW is real, we should be moving to thorium"

Threads that start with a link to a news article.
charlesH
Posts: 168
Joined: May 20, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: Orem, Utah, USA

"If CAGW is real, we should be moving to thorium"

Post by charlesH » Aug 17, 2013 5:08 pm


User avatar
rc1111
Posts: 217
Joined: Dec 29, 2011 10:14 am

Re: "If CAGW is real, we should be moving to thorium"

Post by rc1111 » Aug 17, 2013 8:05 pm

It really does not matter what the future challenges may be, our best chance at survival is dense, abundant, safe, clean, and low cost energy. Climate adaptation, food, disease, asteroids, geologic events, or whatever, our best chance is to have lots of energy to build what we need to build. It is important to stay on top of the race and not be at the mercy of poor preparation and weak power. At least I would choose to have more energy rather than less.

User avatar
NicholasJanssen
Posts: 264
Joined: Mar 22, 2013 1:50 pm

Re: "If CAGW is real, we should be moving to thorium"

Post by NicholasJanssen » Oct 02, 2013 3:07 am

ANY POSSIBLE WORLD ENDING SENARIO...

AND WE NEED LFTR.

aliens? we need LFTR
nuclear winter? we need LFTR
volcano winter? we need LFTR
global warming? we need LFTR
ww3? we need LFTR
total economic collapse? we need LFTR
vast deprecation of USD? we need LFTR
china has LFTR? we need LFTR
china consuming all of our petroleum/gasoline? we need LFTR
unable to compete in global economy? we need LFTR
global cooling? we need LFTR
space exploration? we need LFTR
carbon tax? we need LFTR
air quality issues? we need LFTR
water abundance issues? we need LFTR
cheaper gasoline? we need LFTR
cheaper food? we need LFTR
plagues? we need LFTR
zombies? we need LFTR

jagdish
Posts: 2290
Joined: Apr 19, 2008 1:06 am

Re: "If CAGW is real, we should be moving to thorium"

Post by jagdish » Oct 02, 2013 3:32 am

More power at the socket is a GRAND IDEA.
What I would prefer is a fast spectrum version of the LFTR. No graphite waste or 7Li availability problem.

Post Reply