Uranium vs. Thorium: Mining, Processing, Waste Generation

I’ve taken a little time to do another comparison slide between the waste generated in a typical light-water reactor compared to a liquid-fluoride thorium reactor. For the light-water reactor waste calculations, I used the WISE Uranium Nuclear Fuel Energy Balance Calculator and used a baseline value of 1 GW*yr of electricity production. I accepted all the defaults of the calculator, with the exception that I used a fuel burnup of 35 GW*day/MTU, and a electrical generation efficiency of 33%.

For the fluoride reactor, I assumed

  • complete burn-up of the thorium feed
  • two-fluid fluoride reactor using reductive extraction for blanket fueling/protactinium removal
  • fluorination to recover uranium from the core salt before reprocessing

For the power conversion system, I assumed a triple-reheat helium gas turbine with a 50% electrical conversion efficiency, which is consistent with

  • 1050 K turbine inlet temperature
  • 300 K compressor inlet temperature
  • overall pressure ratio of 8:1
  • 90% compressor efficiency
  • 92% turbine efficiency
  • 95% regenerator effectiveness
  • and 1%/100K pressure losses.

The data on thorium mining came from ORNL/TM-6474.

Here’s the results of my calculations:

Discuss this topic on the Energy from Thorium Discussion Forum



3 Replies to "Uranium vs. Thorium: Mining, Processing, Waste Generation"

  • Jeff
    August 14, 2010 (10:45 pm)

    what companies are mining this now, and what type of equipment is used,thanks

  • Will
    November 18, 2010 (2:27 pm)

    this seems like it would be a good investment.

  • About LFTR – Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactors | LFTR Now
    January 13, 2012 (4:55 pm)

    […] – The “waste” products are far less than that of the Light Water Reactor technology used today.  Also, the amount of mining is far less – and a natural result of a rare earth mine (see above).  (more: http://energyfromthorium.com/2007/01/09/uranium-vs-thorium-mining-processing-waste-generation/) […]

Leave a Reply